agxАндрология и генитальная хирургияAndrology and Genital Surgery2070-97812412-890210.17650/2070-9781-2014-2-23-29agx-91Research ArticleОБЗОРНЫЕ СТАТЬИREVIEWФаллоэндопротезирование: история и развитиеThe history and development of penile prosthesis usageВасильеваЕвгения ЕвгеньевнаVasilyevaE. E.Dr.Evgeniya.V@gmail.comИстрановА. Л.IstranovA. L.Dr.Evgeniya.V@gmail.comАдамянР. Т.AdamyanR. T.Dr.Evgeniya.V@gmail.comГБОУ ВПО «Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава РоссииРоссияI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaRussian Federation2014041220141522329Copyright © Васильева Е.Е., Истранов А.Л., Адамян Р.Т., 20142014Васильева Е.Е., Истранов А.Л., Адамян Р.Т.Vasilyeva E.E., Istranov A.L., Adamyan R.T.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://agx.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/91

Представлен литературный обзор, посвященный хирургическим вмешательствам по протезированию полового члена. Фаллопротезирование является наиболее эффективным методом восстановления функции полового члена, кроме того, эндопротезирование неофаллоса зачастую выполняется пациентам после реконструкции полового члена с целью улучшения его ригидности. В статье освещено историческое развитие инженерии фаллопротезов, а также описаны и проанализированы различные методики хирургических вмешательств, используемые при их установке. Кроме того, раскрыта проблема послеоперационных осложнений и проведен анализ результатов работы различных авторов.

In this paper, we review the current knowledge about surgical procedures for prosthetic penis. Phalloprosthetic operation is the most effective method of reinstatement the function of the penis, in addition endoprosthetic of neofallos often performed in patients after reconstruction of the penis, with the aim of improving its rigidity. The article is devoted to the historical development of phalloprosthesis engineering, and also describes and analyzes the various methods of surgery used in their installation. Additionally in article disclosed the problem of postoperative complications and performed an analysis of the results of different authors.

фаллопротезированиепротезирование полового членафаллопротезыэректильная дисфункцияреконструкция полового членаphalloprostheticpenis prostheticphalloprosthesiserectile dysfunctionpenis reconstructionReferencesStafford-Clark D. The etiology and treatment of impotence. Practitioner 1954;172(1030):397–404.Stafford-Clark D. The etiology and treatment of impotence. Practitioner 1954;172(1030):397–404.Goodwin W.E., Scott W.W. Phalloplasty. J Urol 1952;68(6):903–8.Goodwin W.E., Scott W.W. Phalloplasty. J Urol 1952;68(6):903–8.Lash H. Silicone implant for impotence. J Urol 1968;100(5):709–10.Lash H. Silicone implant for impotence. J Urol 1968;100(5):709–10.Pearman R.O. Treatment of organic impotence by implantation of a penile prosthesis. J Urol 1967;97(4):716–9.Pearman R.O. Treatment of organic impotence by implantation of a penile prosthesis. J Urol 1967;97(4):716–9.Pearman R.O. Insertion of a silastic penile prosthesis for the treatment of organic sexual impotence. J Urol 1972;107(5):802–6.Pearman R.O. Insertion of a silastic penile prosthesis for the treatment of organic sexual impotence. J Urol 1972;107(5):802–6.Beheri G.E. Beheri’s operation for treatment of impotence-observations on 125 cases. Kasr El Aini J Surg 1960;1:390.Beheri G.E. Beheri’s operation for treatment of impotence-observations on 125 cases. Kasr El Aini J Surg 1960;1:390.Beheri G.E. The problem of impotence solved by a new surgical operation. Kasr El Aini J Surg 1960;1:50.Beheri G.E. The problem of impotence solved by a new surgical operation. Kasr El Aini J Surg 1960;1:50.Beheri G.E. Surgical treatment of impotence. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966;38(2):92–7.Beheri G.E. Surgical treatment of impotence. Plast Reconstr Surg 1966;38(2):92–7.Калнберз В. Фаллоэндопротезирование при импотенции. В кн.: Мое время. Рига, 2013. С. 193–214.Калнберз В. Фаллоэндопротезирование при импотенции. В кн.: Мое время. Рига, 2013. С. 193–214.Панин А.Г. Операции при некоторых формах расстройств у мужчин. В кн.: Оперативная урология. Под ред. Н.А. Лопаткина, И.П. Шевцова. М., 1986. С. 442–444.Панин А.Г. Операции при некоторых формах расстройств у мужчин. В кн.: Оперативная урология. Под ред. Н.А. Лопаткина, И.П. Шевцова. М., 1986. С. 442–444.Патент № RU 2073501 МПК А 61 F2/26. Фаллоэндопротез. В.В. Красулин, С.М. Серебренников. Опубл. 20.02.1997.Патент № RU 2073501 МПК А 61 F2/26. Фаллоэндопротез. В.В. Красулин, С.М. Серебренников. Опубл. 20.02.1997.Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., Timm G.W. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1973;2(1):80–2.Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., Timm G.W. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1973;2(1):80–2.Furlow W.L. Inflatable penile prosthesis: Mayo Clinic experience with 175 patients. Urology 1979;13(2):166–71.Furlow W.L. Inflatable penile prosthesis: Mayo Clinic experience with 175 patients. Urology 1979;13(2):166–71.Kabalin J.N., Kessler R. Five-year followup of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with semirigid penile prosthesis. J Urol 1988;140(6): 1428–30.Kabalin J.N., Kessler R. Five-year followup of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with semirigid penile prosthesis. J Urol 1988;140(6): 1428–30.Malloy T.R., Wein A.J., Carpiniello V.L. Further experience with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1979;122(4):478–80.Malloy T.R., Wein A.J., Carpiniello V.L. Further experience with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1979;122(4):478–80.Merrill D.C. Clinical experience with Scott inflatable penile prosthesis in 150 patients. Urology 1983;22(4):371–5.Merrill D.C. Clinical experience with Scott inflatable penile prosthesis in 150 patients. Urology 1983;22(4):371–5.Small M.P. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: a report on 160 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 1978;119(3):365–8.Small M.P. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: a report on 160 cases and review of the literature. J Urol 1978;119(3):365–8.Small M.P., Carrion H.M., Gordon J.A. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: new implant for management of impotence. Urology 1975;5(4):479–86.Small M.P., Carrion H.M., Gordon J.A. Small-Carrion penile prosthesis: new implant for management of impotence. Urology 1975;5(4):479–86.Finney R.P. New hinged silicone penile implant. J Urol 1977;118(4):585–7.Finney R.P. New hinged silicone penile implant. J Urol 1977;118(4):585–7.Finney R.P., Sharpe J.R., Sadlowski R.W. Finney hinged penile implant: experience with 100 cases. J Urol 1980;124(2):205–7.Finney R.P., Sharpe J.R., Sadlowski R.W. Finney hinged penile implant: experience with 100 cases. J Urol 1980;124(2):205–7.Jonas U., Jacobi G.H. Silicone-silver penile prosthesis: description, operative approach and results. J Urol 1980;123(6):865–7.Jonas U., Jacobi G.H. Silicone-silver penile prosthesis: description, operative approach and results. J Urol 1980;123(6):865–7.Dorflinger T., Bruskewitz R. AMS malleable penile prosthesis. Urology 1986;28(6):480–5.Dorflinger T., Bruskewitz R. AMS malleable penile prosthesis. Urology 1986;28(6):480–5.Moul J.W., McLeod D.G. Experience with the AMS 600 malleable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1986;135(5):929–31.Moul J.W., McLeod D.G. Experience with the AMS 600 malleable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1986;135(5):929–31.Salama N. Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East – is it different from that reported elsewhere? Int J Impot Res 2004;16(2):175–80.Salama N. Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East – is it different from that reported elsewhere? Int J Impot Res 2004;16(2):175–80.Huisman T.K., Macintyre R.C. Mechanical failure of OmniPhase penile prosthesis. Urology 1988;31(6):515–6.Huisman T.K., Macintyre R.C. Mechanical failure of OmniPhase penile prosthesis. Urology 1988;31(6):515–6.Levinson K., Whitehead E.D. Omniphase penile prosthesis: delayed bilateral central cable breakage. J Urol 1989;141(3):618–9.Levinson K., Whitehead E.D. Omniphase penile prosthesis: delayed bilateral central cable breakage. J Urol 1989;141(3):618–9.Hrebinko R., Bahnson R.R., Schwentker F.N., O’Donnell W.F. Early experience with the DuraPhase penile prosthesis. J Urol 1990;143(1):60–1.Hrebinko R., Bahnson R.R., Schwentker F.N., O’Donnell W.F. Early experience with the DuraPhase penile prosthesis. J Urol 1990;143(1):60–1.Thompson I.M., Rodriguez F.R., Zeidman E.J. Experience with Duraphase penile prosthesis: its use as replacement device. Urology 1990;36(6):505–7.Thompson I.M., Rodriguez F.R., Zeidman E.J. Experience with Duraphase penile prosthesis: its use as replacement device. Urology 1990;36(6):505–7.Mulcahy J.J., Krane R.J., Lloyd L.K. et al. Duraphase penile prosthesis – results of clinical trials in 63 patients. J Urol 1990;143(3):518–9.Mulcahy J.J., Krane R.J., Lloyd L.K. et al. Duraphase penile prosthesis – results of clinical trials in 63 patients. J Urol 1990;143(3):518–9.Kearse W.S. Jr., Sago A.L., Peretsman S.J. et al. Report of a multicenter clinical evaluation of the Dura-II penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996;155(5):1613–6.Kearse W.S. Jr., Sago A.L., Peretsman S.J. et al. Report of a multicenter clinical evaluation of the Dura-II penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996;155(5):1613–6.Ferguson K.H., Cespedes R.D. Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement. Urology 2003;61(2):437–41.Ferguson K.H., Cespedes R.D. Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement. Urology 2003;61(2):437–41.Fathy A., Shamloul R., Abdel Rahim A. et al. Experience with tube (Promedon) malleable penile implant. Urol Int 2007;79(3):244–7.Fathy A., Shamloul R., Abdel Rahim A. et al. Experience with tube (Promedon) malleable penile implant. Urol Int 2007;79(3):244–7.Subrini L. A biomechanical study of flexible penile implants. Ann Urol (Paris) 1993;27(3):192–6.Subrini L. A biomechanical study of flexible penile implants. Ann Urol (Paris) 1993;27(3):192–6.Subrini L. Flexible penile implants in the restoration of erectile function. Ann Urol (Paris) 1993;27(3):183–91.Subrini L. Flexible penile implants in the restoration of erectile function. Ann Urol (Paris) 1993;27(3):183–91.Subrini L. Flexible penile implants. An experience over 60 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1994;39(1):15–26.Subrini L. Flexible penile implants. An experience over 60 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 1994;39(1):15–26.Merrill D.C. Mentor inflatable penile prostheses. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16(1):51–66.Merrill D.C. Mentor inflatable penile prostheses. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16(1):51–66.Engel R.M., Fein R.L. Mentor GFS inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1990;35(5):405–6.Engel R.M., Fein R.L. Mentor GFS inflatable prosthesis. Urology 1990;35(5):405–6.Fein R.L. The G.F.S. Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1992;147(1):66–8.Fein R.L. The G.F.S. Mark II inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1992;147(1):66–8.Pereira Arias J.G., Escobal Tamayo V., Maraña Fernandez M.T. et al. Penile prosthetic implant in the treatment of impotence: our experience. Arch Esp Urol 1994;47(7):703–8.Pereira Arias J.G., Escobal Tamayo V., Maraña Fernandez M.T. et al. Penile prosthetic implant in the treatment of impotence: our experience. Arch Esp Urol 1994;47(7):703–8.Levine L.A., Estrada C.R., Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol 2001;166(3):932–7.Levine L.A., Estrada C.R., Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol 2001;166(3):932–7.Lux M., Reyes-Vallejo L., Morgentaler A., Levine L.A. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol 2007;177(1):262–6.Lux M., Reyes-Vallejo L., Morgentaler A., Levine L.A. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol 2007;177(1):262–6.Merrill D.C. Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1983;22(5):504–5.Merrill D.C. Mentor inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1983;22(5):504–5.Goldstein I., Bertero E.B., Kaufman J.M. et al. Early experience with the first preconnected 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: the Mentor Alpha-1. J Urol 1993;150(6):1814–8.Goldstein I., Bertero E.B., Kaufman J.M. et al. Early experience with the first preconnected 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: the Mentor Alpha-1. J Urol 1993;150(6):1814–8.Garber B.B. Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: patient satisfaction and device reliability. Urology 1994;43(2):214–7.Garber B.B. Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: patient satisfaction and device reliability. Urology 1994;43(2):214–7.Wilson S.K., Henry G.D., Delk J.R. Jr., Cleves M.A. The mentor Alpha 1 penile prosthesis with reservoir lock-out valve: effective prevention of auto-inflation with improved capability for ectopic reservoir placement. J Urol 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1475–8.Wilson S.K., Henry G.D., Delk J.R. Jr., Cleves M.A. The mentor Alpha 1 penile prosthesis with reservoir lock-out valve: effective prevention of auto-inflation with improved capability for ectopic reservoir placement. J Urol 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1475–8.Carson C.C. 3rd. Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol 2004;171(4):1611–4.Carson C.C. 3rd. Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol 2004;171(4):1611–4.Carson C.C. Initial success with AMS 700 series inflatable penile prosthesis with Inhibizone antibiotic surface treatment: a retrospective review of revision cases incidence and comparative results versus nontreated devices. J Urol 2004;171:S894.Carson C.C. Initial success with AMS 700 series inflatable penile prosthesis with Inhibizone antibiotic surface treatment: a retrospective review of revision cases incidence and comparative results versus nontreated devices. J Urol 2004;171:S894.Wolter C.E., Hellstrom J.G. The hydrophilic-coated penile prosthesis: 1-year experience. J Sex Med 2004;1(2):221–4.Wolter C.E., Hellstrom J.G. The hydrophilic-coated penile prosthesis: 1-year experience. J Sex Med 2004;1(2):221–4.Montague D.K., Jarow J.P., Broderick G.A. et al.; Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. Chapter 1: the management of erectile dysfunction: an AUA update. J Urol 2005;174(1):230–9.Montague D.K., Jarow J.P., Broderick G.A. et al.; Erectile Dysfunction Guideline Update Panel. Chapter 1: the management of erectile dysfunction: an AUA update. J Urol 2005;174(1):230–9.Dhar N.B., Angermeier K.W., Montague D.K. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2599–601.Dhar N.B., Angermeier K.W., Montague D.K. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2006;176(6 Pt 1):2599–601.Wilson S.K., Delk J.R., Salem E.A., Cleves M.A. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med 2007; 4(4 Pt 1):1074–9.Wilson S.K., Delk J.R., Salem E.A., Cleves M.A. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med 2007; 4(4 Pt 1):1074–9.Glina S., Martins F. Técnicas de implante. In: Disfunção Sexual Masculina. São Paulo: Inst H Hellis, 2002. Рp. 259–62.Glina S., Martins F. Técnicas de implante. In: Disfunção Sexual Masculina. São Paulo: Inst H Hellis, 2002. Рp. 259–62.Evans C. The use of penile prostheses in the treatment of impotence. Br J Urol 1998;81(4):591–8.Evans C. The use of penile prostheses in the treatment of impotence. Br J Urol 1998;81(4):591–8.Scarzella G.L. Transverse scrotal approach for insertion of AMS inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1990;35(4):373.Scarzella G.L. Transverse scrotal approach for insertion of AMS inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1990;35(4):373.Wilson S.K. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bodies. Int J Impot Res 2003;15(Suppl 5):S125–8.Wilson S.K. Reimplantation of inflatable penile prosthesis into scarred corporeal bodies. Int J Impot Res 2003;15(Suppl 5):S125–8.Wilson S.K., Cleves M.A., Delk J.R. 2nd. Long-term follow-up of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2001;165(3):825–9.Wilson S.K., Cleves M.A., Delk J.R. 2nd. Long-term follow-up of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 2001;165(3):825–9.Brusky J.P., Tran V.Q., Rieder J.M., Aboseif S.R. A preliminary report on combined penoscrotal and perineal approach for placement of penile prosthesis with corporal fibrosis. Adv Urol 2008:524392. doi: 10.1155/2008/524392.Brusky J.P., Tran V.Q., Rieder J.M., Aboseif S.R. A preliminary report on combined penoscrotal and perineal approach for placement of penile prosthesis with corporal fibrosis. Adv Urol 2008:524392. doi: 10.1155/2008/524392.Sadeghi-Nejad H., Ilbeigi P., Wilson S.K. et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res 2005;17(6):535–8.Sadeghi-Nejad H., Ilbeigi P., Wilson S.K. et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res 2005;17(6):535–8.Bettocchi C., Ditonno P., Palumbo F. et al. Penile prosthesis: what should we do about complications? Adv Urol 2008 573560. doi: 10.1155/2008/573560.Bettocchi C., Ditonno P., Palumbo F. et al. Penile prosthesis: what should we do about complications? Adv Urol 2008 573560. doi: 10.1155/2008/573560.Govier F.E., Gibbons R.P., Correa R.J. et al. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1998;52(2):282–6.Govier F.E., Gibbons R.P., Correa R.J. et al. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1998;52(2):282–6.Minervini A., Ralph D.J., Pryor J.P. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedure. BJU Int 2006;97(1):129–33.Minervini A., Ralph D.J., Pryor J.P. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedure. BJU Int 2006;97(1):129–33.Carson C.C., Mulcahy J.J., Govier F.E. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: result of a long term multicenter study AMS 700CX Study Group. J Urol 2000;164(2):376–80.Carson C.C., Mulcahy J.J., Govier F.E. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: result of a long term multicenter study AMS 700CX Study Group. J Urol 2000;164(2):376–80.Dinsmore W., Evans C. ABC of sexual health: erectile dysfunction. BMJ 1999;318(7180):387–90.Dinsmore W., Evans C. ABC of sexual health: erectile dysfunction. BMJ 1999;318(7180):387–90.Щеплев П.А., Аль-Газо А.М. Протезирование полового члена. Отдаленные результаты, cоциальные и партнерские аспекты. Материалы научных исследований РМАПО «Успехи теоретической и клинической медицины», 2003. Вып. 5. С. 297.Щеплев П.А., Аль-Газо А.М. Протезирование полового члена. Отдаленные результаты, cоциальные и партнерские аспекты. Материалы научных исследований РМАПО «Успехи теоретической и клинической медицины», 2003. Вып. 5. С. 297.Mulcahy J.J. Use of penile implants in the constructed neophallus. Int J Impot Res 2003;15 Suppl 5:S129–31.Mulcahy J.J. Use of penile implants in the constructed neophallus. Int J Impot Res 2003;15 Suppl 5:S129–31.Hinds P.R., Wilson S.K., Sadeghi-Nejad H. Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: what practices achieve the best outcomes and the lowest infection rates? (CME). J Sex Med 2012;9(10):2483–91.Hinds P.R., Wilson S.K., Sadeghi-Nejad H. Dilemmas of inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: what practices achieve the best outcomes and the lowest infection rates? (CME). J Sex Med 2012;9(10):2483–91.Hage J.J. Dynaflex prosthesis in total phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99(2):479–85.Hage J.J. Dynaflex prosthesis in total phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99(2):479–85.Fisch M., Wammack R., Ahlers J. et al. Osseous fixation of a penile prosthesis after transsexual phalloplasty: a case report. J Urol 1993;149(1):122–5.Fisch M., Wammack R., Ahlers J. et al. Osseous fixation of a penile prosthesis after transsexual phalloplasty: a case report. J Urol 1993;149(1):122–5.Miranda-Sousa A., Keating M., Moreira S. et al. Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med 2007;4(5):1494–9.Miranda-Sousa A., Keating M., Moreira S. et al. Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med 2007;4(5):1494–9.Hoebeke P., de Cuypere G., Ceulemans P., Monstrey S. Obtaining rigidity in total phalloplasty: experience with 35 patients. J Urol 2003;169(1):221–3.Hoebeke P., de Cuypere G., Ceulemans P., Monstrey S. Obtaining rigidity in total phalloplasty: experience with 35 patients. J Urol 2003;169(1):221–3.Perovic S.V., Djinovic R., Bumbasirevic M. et al. Total phalloplasty using a musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. BJU Int 2007;100(4): 899–905.Perovic S.V., Djinovic R., Bumbasirevic M. et al. Total phalloplasty using a musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. BJU Int 2007;100(4): 899–905.Люндуп А.В., Медведев Ю.А., Баласанова К.В. и др. Методы тканевой инженерии костной ткани в челюстно-лицевой хирургии. Вестн РАМН 2013;(5):10–5.Люндуп А.В., Медведев Ю.А., Баласанова К.В. и др. Методы тканевой инженерии костной ткани в челюстно-лицевой хирургии. Вестн РАМН 2013;(5):10–5.Yoo J.J., Lee I., Atala A. Cartilage rods as a potential material for penile reconstruction. J Urol 1998;160(3 Pt 2):1164–8.Yoo J.J., Lee I., Atala A. Cartilage rods as a potential material for penile reconstruction. J Urol 1998;160(3 Pt 2):1164–8.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.